Indiana guide

Indiana governance risk

Indiana governance runs on the Homeowners Associations Act (IC 32-25.5-3) for HOAs, the Indiana Condominium Act (IC 32-25-8) for condos, and the Nonprofit Corporation Act (IC 23-17), substantially reshaped by the 2026 HB 1115 reforms. Critically, Indiana has no state condo or HOA regulator, no ombudsman, and no community-association-manager licensing.

Risk Intelligence

Review the documents before your contingency ends

Get my free risk report

Expert Matching

Need a real estate lawyer or mortgage specialist?

The Attorney General's Homeowner Protection Unit can act only in narrow situations under IC 32-25.5-4-1 — misappropriation or fraud by a board member, use of position to commit fraud or a criminal act, proxy violations, and budget-process or records-access violations. Outside those buckets the AG generally responds that it has no authority, and most owner-versus-association disputes go through the statutory grievance process (IC 32-25.5-5 for HOAs; IC 32-25-8.5 for condos) and then civil court. Two features shape governance diligence: the records-access rules under IC 32-25.5-3-3, now fee-free after HB 1115, and the 2026 reform package itself — adopted Schedule of Fines, four-day meeting notice, and a two-thirds cap on owner-consent thresholds — which many associations have not yet adopted.

Free personalized check

See which condo risks deserve your attention

Answer a few questions based on your state and situation. No documents required.

Private by default. Save only when you choose.

No state regulator; narrow AG authority

Indiana has no agency that supervises, licenses, or enforces against condo associations or HOAs, no ombudsman, and no HOA registration; associations register only as nonprofit corporations with the Secretary of State. The Attorney General's Homeowner Protection Unit can act under IC 32-25.5-4-1 only for misappropriation or fraud, use of a board position to commit fraud or a crime, proxy violations, and budget-process or records-access violations. Reporting indicates 500-plus HOA complaints since 2009 but very few AG lawsuits, so the practical remedy for most disputes is the statutory grievance process and then court.

Records access and the 2026 fee ban

Under IC 32-25.5-3-3, HOA financial records and board-meeting minutes must be available to members on written request identifying the records with reasonable particularity, and access cannot be unreasonably denied or conditioned on stating a purpose, with carve-outs for attorney-client material, unexecuted contracts, another member's account, and records older than two years. The 2026 HB 1115 changes removed the prior search-and-copy fee (no charge for the first hour, then up to $35 per hour capped at $200), so associations may no longer charge owners for producing requested records. A records refusal or a fee charged is now a governance red flag.

Meetings, notice, and fining after HB 1115

Members may attend any board meeting; the board may meet in private only to discuss delinquent assessments or, with counsel, threatened, pending, or initiated litigation. HB 1115 now requires at least four days' written notice with an agenda before a board meeting, and treats remote attendance as being present. It also lets all associations impose fines even without express document authority, but only after adopting a Schedule of Fines (violation types, amounts, recurrence, aggregate cap) with proper notice. A short meeting notice, an improper closed session, or fining without an adopted Schedule of Fines is a red flag.

Voting thresholds, proxies, and 2026 owner rights

HB 1115 capped owner-consent thresholds at two-thirds, curbing the 75 and 95 percent super-majorities common in older documents. Proxies under IC 32-25.5-3-10 may be limited to specific matters, expire no later than 180 days after given, and must be retained with the meeting records; Indiana does not authorize electronic member voting, and loan votes require paper ballots. HB 1210 (effective July 1, 2026) limits voting on rental restrictions to owner-occupants. Confirm the governing documents have been conformed to these 2026 changes — outdated super-majorities or missing fining schedules are the most common findings.

Ask CondoSignal

Have a question about board governance?

Get a plain-English answer from our research across all 50 states — free, in seconds.

Indiana legal references

Informational only. Not legal advice. Always confirm against current statute and counsel.

Need help applying these Indiana statutes to your specific situation? We can connect you with state-licensed counsel and specialists familiar with this exact regulatory environment.

Find a Indiana specialist

Reviewer's checklist

  • Confirm the governing documents have been conformed to the 2026 HB 1115 changes
  • Confirm an adopted Schedule of Fines exists before any fining
  • Confirm board-meeting notice meets the four-day-with-agenda requirement
  • Check for improper closed sessions beyond the delinquency and litigation exceptions
  • Confirm records access is honored without a fee (fees now barred under HB 1115)
  • Check for owner-consent thresholds above two-thirds (now unlawful)
  • Review proxies for the IC 32-25.5-3-10 limits (180-day expiration; retained with records)
  • Confirm loan votes used paper ballots (no electronic member voting in Indiana)
  • Check how rental-restriction voting applied the HB 1210 owner-occupant rule
  • Look for any AG-actionable issue under IC 32-25.5-4-1 (fraud, proxy, budget, records)
  • Read board and member minutes for governance and dispute history

Want this same review on your actual documents? We do it free, with page citations you can verify.

Get my free risk report

Want every document to request before you buy in Indiana — with the local red flags and the statute behind each? See the complete Indiana condo due-diligence checklist →

How CondoSignal reads a document package

Source documents

  • Declaration & bylawsthe rules
  • Budget & financialsthe money
  • Reserve studythe big repairs
  • Meeting minuteswhat the board fears
read together

Cross-reference

The risk lives in the contradiction between documents.

An assessment in the minutes but not the estoppel; a reserve the budget never funds.

scored

Risk report

Severity-graded across 8 categories.

Every finding cites the document, page number, and quoted text.

How CondoSignal reviews this

We read the reserve study, operating budget, and 24 months of meeting minutes togetherindiana governance risk risk usually lives in the contradiction between documents, not in any single one of them. Every finding cites the source document, the page number, and the quoted text behind it.

See our 8-category framework →

Risk Intelligence

Review the documents before your contingency ends

Most buyers get 7–14 days to review condo documents. Upload the packet — we read the reserve study, budget, minutes, and insurance summary and flag the risks, every finding linked to the exact page. Free.

Expert Matching

Need a real estate lawyer or mortgage specialist?

We can connect you with vetted real estate lawyers, mortgage brokers, and insurance brokers familiar with the specifics of condo and HOA transactions.

  • HOA lawyer
  • Property manager

Already own in Indiana?

Owner guides for the notice you just got

Already dealing with a specific Indiana situation? Start here instead of the buyer flow:

Reviewed by Kirk Hasley, Founder. Every claim here is checked against current Indiana statute and primary sources, using the same documented review framework we run on every file. Last reviewed June 13, 2026.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What a finding looks like

Every finding cites the exact page in your documents

Sample finding — illustrative
ElevatedSpecial assessment risk

“The board approved a $15,000-per-unit special assessment for façade repairs, payable over 12 months.”

Source: Board meeting minutes, p. 12 — quoted and linked in your report so you can verify it in seconds.

Your free report checks 14 risk categories this way. Get my free risk report →

Built for trust

Premium due-diligence software — not a chatbot.

Source citations on every finding

Every risk indicator links back to the exact document, page number, and quoted line. You can verify our work in seconds.

Free with transparent consent — or paid and private

Our free option is supported by limited, opt-in referrals you control. Or pay once for a fully private review with no data sharing.

Consistent, documented analysis

Consistent scoring — same documents always produce the same results. No guesswork, no chat-style answers.

Informational, never legal advice

We surface what your documents actually say so you can ask better questions of your attorney, lender, and inspector.

Documents encrypted on upload (AES-256)Documents deleted after 30 daysYou control which professionals can contact youOpt out of referrals anytime

Risk Intelligence

Review the documents before your contingency ends

Most buyers get 7–14 days to review condo documents. Upload the packet — we read the reserve study, budget, minutes, and insurance summary and flag the risks, every finding linked to the exact page. Free.

Expert Matching

Need a real estate lawyer or mortgage specialist?

We can connect you with vetted real estate lawyers, mortgage brokers, and insurance brokers familiar with the specifics of condo and HOA transactions.

  • HOA lawyer
  • Property manager