Greater Boston document review
Boston concentrates a substantial share of Massachusetts condo activity — Back Bay, Beacon Hill, South End brownstones, Seaport and downtown towers, and the converted triple-deckers and warehouses across Allston, Brighton, Dorchester, and South Boston. Building ages run from pre-1900 brownstones through post-2010 towers, with most of the diligence-intensive stock falling in the converted-and-aging-inventory category.
Risk Intelligence
Get Your Free Condo Risk Report
Expert Matching
Need a real estate lawyer or mortgage specialist?
Why Boston is different
Boston adds the Section 9-9.12 Facade Ordinance for buildings above 70 feet, on top of M.G.L. c.183A's statutory framework.
Buildings over 70 feet (or large multi-unit buildings) must undergo periodic facade inspections by a registered engineer or architect, generally every 5 years. Request the most recent inspection report. Non-compliance can result in fines or vacate orders. Absence of a report for a covered building is a material finding.
Many Boston condos are conversions of pre-existing brownstones, triple-deckers, or industrial buildings. Conversion-era documentation quality varies; post-conversion deferred maintenance accumulates. Voluntary engineering and envelope reports are particularly informative.
Pre-1980 Boston condo stock often faces plumbing-riser replacement, electrical upgrades, roof and brick-pointing programs, and window-system work. Reserve adequacy under c.183A's 'adequate' standard varies widely. Read budget, reserve balance, and minutes together for capital trajectory.
Massachusetts-specific guides
Massachusetts condo document review operates under M.G.L. Chapter 183A — one of the older U.S. condo statutes. The only statutorily required resale disclosure is the 6(d) certificate of unpaid common expenses, delivered within 10 business days of written request. There is no statutory rescission. For converted-era stock, particularly Greater Boston brownstones and triple-deckers, conversion-specific diligence questions add significant complexity beyond the standard packet.
Read →
Massachusetts is a hybrid reserve jurisdiction. M.G.L. c.183A requires condo associations to maintain an "adequate replacement reserve fund" — but does not define adequate, does not require a formal reserve study, and sets no funding target. A pending bill (S.980) would require reserve studies every 10 years for 50+-unit condos, but it is not yet law. For older Massachusetts stock, the gap between statutory compliance and practical adequacy is one of the leading sources of unexpected special-assessment exposure.
Read →
Massachusetts gives condo boards broad special-assessment authority under M.G.L. c.183A. The Act permits levying special assessments by amending the budget for capital improvements or expense shortfalls. There is no statutory cap; caps and approval thresholds live in the bylaws. HOAs operate entirely under contract. For both, reading bylaws and minutes alongside the 6(d) certificate reveals where future assessments form.
Read →
Massachusetts condo insurance reads against M.G.L. c.183A's mandate that the association insure common areas. The Act does not specify peril treatment, deductibles, or coverage limits. Wind, hail, and named-storm deductibles are increasingly common for coastal buildings; flood is separately covered through NFIP or private flood policies. The Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Association (MPIUA FAIR Plan) serves as insurer of last resort for properties that cannot place coverage in the admitted market.
Read →
Massachusetts condo governance operates under M.G.L. c.183A with provisions for records access (§10(c)(4)), open meetings, and annual CPA review for 50+ unit condos. HOAs operate under general corporate or trust law with no statutory governance framework. There is no state HOA regulator, no specialized ombudsman, and no central registry. Reading the minutes and submitting a test records request reveals practical governance quality.
Read →
Topic guides
A condo document review is the structured analysis of every disclosure document your seller or association has provided — declaration, bylaws, rules, reserve study, budgets, financials, meeting minutes, insurance summary, estoppel or resale certificate, and any pending special assessment notices. Done well, it tells you exactly what you are buying. Done in a hurry — or as a chat session against a single PDF — it misses the cross-references where real risk lives.
A reserve study tells you what the association expects to spend on long-term capital repairs and replacements, and whether it is funding those obligations adequately. Reading the study without also reading the actual reserve balance, the current budget's contribution line, and recent meeting minutes is the single most common mistake in condo due diligence — and the one most likely to produce an expensive surprise after closing.
Special assessments are the single largest source of financial surprise in condo and HOA ownership. They can arrive formally, as a voted board action with a disclosed amount. They can arrive indirectly, as a dues increase that follows a reserve shortfall or insurance spike. Or they can arrive silently, implied by the gap between what an association has saved and what it needs — visible in documents years before any official announcement. A thorough document review identifies all three types.
The association's master insurance policy determines what your personal HO-6 policy needs to cover — and what it does not. Deductibles, named-storm provisions, water and flood exclusions, policy form (bare-walls versus all-in), carrier quality, and loss assessment exposure all change the real cost of ownership in ways that never appear in the listing price. Reading the insurance summary alone is not enough; reading the master policy declarations page against the declaration's loss assessment provisions is where the real exposure lives.
An association's governance health is a leading indicator of every other risk. Boards make decisions about reserve funding, repair scope, insurance coverage, and vendor relationships. Functional boards make those decisions transparently and on time. Dysfunctional boards defer them, obscure them, or make them for the wrong reasons — and the deferred decisions show up later as assessments, deteriorated infrastructure, and insurance problems. A governance review reads meeting minutes, election and recall records, financial controls, and dispute history across multiple years to surface the patterns that precede financial problems.
Local experts
Boston has its own carrier landscape, statutes, and transaction conventions. We can introduce you to Massachusetts-licensed specialists who handle exactly this market — no obligation, no cost.
Boston realtors with condo and HOA transaction experience who know which buildings have surfaced risk in recent disclosures.
Boston-area attorneys handling estoppel review, special assessment disputes, governance issues, and condo / HOA litigation.
Brokers familiar with the Boston carrier landscape — master policy gaps, wind/named-storm deductibles, and HO-6 sizing.
Built for trust
Every risk indicator links back to the exact document, page number, and quoted line. You can verify our work in seconds.
Our free option is supported by limited, opt-in referrals you control. Or pay once for a fully private review with no data sharing.
Consistent scoring — same documents always produce the same results. No guesswork, no chat-style answers.
We surface what your documents actually say so you can ask better questions of your attorney, lender, and inspector.
FAQ
Risk Intelligence
Upload condo or HOA documents for a free risk review. We read reserve studies, budgets, meeting minutes, insurance summaries, and assessment exposure — every finding linked to the exact page.
Expert Matching
We can connect you with vetted real estate lawyers, mortgage brokers, and insurance brokers familiar with the specifics of condo and HOA transactions.
