Operating Budget, line 14 + M.G.L. c.183A §10
Reserves 'adequate' on paper; no study; pre-1985 conversion
- What we found
- Reserve balance $84,000 with $14,000/year contribution. No reserve study has been commissioned. Building was condo-converted in 1986 from 1890s construction. Trustees have characterized the fund as 'adequate' as M.G.L. c.183A §10 requires, but no engineering basis supports the figure.
- Why it matters
- Massachusetts requires reserves but does not define 'adequate' and does not require a study. Pre-1985 conversion stock typically has under-disclosed capital exposure — the underlying construction wasn't designed for condo ownership and deferred maintenance accumulates.
- What to ask
- When was the last engineering review of the building envelope, roof, and mechanicals? What's the actual replacement cycle for major systems?
Concerned about this finding on your documents?